Skip to main content
losing.hair

Medical Review Policy

How clinical content on losing.hair is checked before publication — an automated evidence gate, not a human medical reviewer.

This page was written by AI from cited sources. It is not medical advice.

This site does not use human medical reviewers

Content on losing.hair is written by AI systems working from authoritative sources — regulatory drug labels (FDA/DailyMed), clinical trial registries (ClinicalTrials.gov), systematic reviews, clinical guidelines, and primary research. No doctor or other clinician reviews individual pages before they are published, and we do not claim otherwise.

Instead of a human reviewer, every clinical page must pass an automated evidence gate before it can be published. If a page cannot pass, it is not published. There is no override.

What the evidence gate checks

The gate has several independent layers:

  1. Deterministic checks (exact, rule-based). Every factual claim must cite a verified source that actually exists. Quoted text must appear word-for-word in the source. The claim's details — which drug, what dose and form, taken by mouth or applied to the skin, which group of people it was studied in — must match the cited source exactly. A mismatch blocks publication before anything else runs.
  2. Independent AI graders. Separate AI systems, built on different underlying models than the one that wrote the page, examine every claim adversarially — trying to prove it wrong, not to approve it. They check that each source truly supports its claim, that the wording is no stronger than the evidence, that important safety information (side effects, warnings, who should not use a treatment) is not missing, and that the page as a whole is not misleading even if each sentence is technically accurate.
  3. Bounded repair. When a check fails, a separate AI system corrects only the specific problem and the whole page is re-checked from scratch. If a page still cannot pass after a limited number of attempts, it is quarantined: set aside, never published, and flagged for investigation.
  4. Ongoing monitoring and rollback. After publication, sources are re-checked on a schedule. If a drug label changes, a study is retracted, or any safety-relevant problem is found, the page is automatically corrected, rolled back to its last passing version, or taken down.

The strictest rules apply to the highest-risk information: dosing, contraindications, and drug interactions are stated in substance exactly as the regulatory label states them, or they are left out entirely.

What we never publish

  • Diagnosis of any kind, or advice for your individual situation.
  • Any claim we cannot trace to a verified, publicly linked authoritative source. Every published page links its sources so you can check them.
  • Fabricated or misattributed citations. This is the one failure this system is built above all else to prevent.

Where things stand today

As of July 2026, this checking system is being built and no clinical content is published on this site yet. Nothing clinical will be published until it passes the gate described here.

Disclaimer

> Educational information only—not medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. > Hair-loss treatments may have risks and may not be appropriate for everyone. > Discuss diagnosis and treatment decisions with a qualified healthcare > professional.